Workgroup Meeting, June 19th, 2009 - Athens/Glyfada, Greece
18:00 - 19:00
Attendance: 11
Agenda:
No special presentation on security in the WG was scheduled.
However, there were two general special events presented at NetWare 2010:
One Tutorial
Using the AMBER Data Repository to Analyze, Share and Cross-exploit Dependability Data
Marco Vieira and Henrique Madeira
One Keynote Speech
Industrial Challenges in Working with Events
Petre Dini
See DEPEND 2009 Program.
Discussions:
- There were discussions on enlarging the dissemination of DEPEND
- This year, one of the most challenging issues was that another conference on Dependability was scheduled in the same period, in Europe; in the next year, it will be in USA - Chicago, so it does not interfere with what we are planning now.
- Help is expected from all the committee members for a careful dissemination, avoiding spamming
- The promotion of young researchers was appreciated; more work to be done offline with volunteers
- It was an open call to suggest regular refresh to the topics under the Call on DEPEND
- There were logistics discussions on:
- Registration fees / the structure of the fees was disclosed and discussed. On the one hand, we don’t want to create ‘student category’ with limited benefits when attending.
- There was a suggestion to include (even higher registration fees) the lunch; there are definitively a few issues, mainly, on (i) special diets, (ii) those who do not attend, and (iii) those who attend only partially. Logistically speaking, this put an extra work, with limited benefits.
- However, the idea of “dinner-together” is more feasible and it will be implemented from the next events. Enrollment will be daily, and a travel agency might help to identity the best places.
Please have a look at the DEPEND 2010 site
Suggestions are welcome at petre@iaria.org
The procedure of invitation-only for extended versions of selected papers among those presented for on-line IARIA journals, with no additional fees, was appreciated.
Suggestions:
- Try to better handle the reviews (having openly posted, eventually anonymous will incite the authors to be more careful when submitting and the reviewers to pay more attention). There were pros and cons to provide clear reviews on disclosed titles and authors. The issue will be brought to the Board.
- Clearly, the technical program committee must be tuned to reflect new topics and assure a fair peer-to-peer review process.
Publications:
- The option to publish in an open digital library was discussed; this will allow having all the proceedings of the co-located events on the same CD Proceedings, and full free access to any publication. Apparently there is a consensus that publishing in an archived form is more beneficial than publishing in a privately owned portal, including IEEE Xplore or ACM Portal. On the other side, university administration might have different rules for evaluation.
- Referring to classification rules:
- The attempts to classify scientific events have no an accurate basis
- Different countries are listening to different rules
- Apparently, the most important is to have the events indexed (ISI, EI, etc.)
- The only caveat is that the computer scientists’ community is not yet used to it, as the scientists in physics or mathematics.
- This issue will be carried further on to the IARIA Board for careful attention.
Next steps:
- Develop the new topics via off-line exchanges
- Extend invitations for DEPEND committee membership
- Identify particular lists for candidate contributors.
DEPEND 2010:
- Announce the new topics with the CfP for DEPEND 2010
- Location: yet to be defined, most probably, Venice (Italy)
- DEPEND 2010 will be organized under NetWare 2010, most probably in July 2010